Co-designing clinical trials alongside youth with chronic pain infographic

Text Version

CO-DESIGNING CLINICAL TRIALS ALONGSIDE YOUTH WITH CHRONIC PAIN

We led four virtual, semi-structured discussion groups to gain insight from youth on recruitment and retention preferences, potential barriers to research and study design on clinical trials involving children and adolescents with pain. Engagement evaluations were done following final group session using Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET).

16 youth from across Canada (15-18 years old) recruited from KidsCan Young Persons' Research Advisory Group (YPRAG) and Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) between April and December 2020.

Recruitment and retention preferences for clinical trials

  • Prefer to be contacted by the medical team

  • Personalized invitation email, rather than generic emails

  • Would not respond to social media ads

  • Mixed opinions on method of communication (phone, text, email)

  • Mixed opinions on frequency of reminders

  • Individual pain management and fear management strategies could improve comfort of blood draws

  • Prefer blood draws at same place, same time and with the same nurse

  • Would like snacks available for longer appointments and around lunch time

Potential barriers (and solutions) to participation

  • Time constraint was main barrier – often due to limited times that they are pain-free and also because parents may need time off work

    • Suggested appointments happen on same days and times each month (e.g., the 15th at 3pm)

  • Lack of information about study

    • Full details of study procedures/intervention in an accessible format before agreeing to participate Suggested creating an infographic and video that explains the study and its impact

Youth experience and recommendations for youth engagement

  • All agreed they had clear understanding of discussion group purpose and information needed to participate, and had enough information to contribute to the discussion

  • All agreed or strongly agreed they could share views freely

  • 7/8 responded their views were heard and there was a wide range of views discussed

  • All agreed or strongly agreed that discussion group achieved stated objectives, they were confident their input would be used to design pain studies and will make a difference

  • Need for a more gender-diverse group

For more information, visit www.medcannkids.ca

Produced by Jessica Steer and Zina Zaslawski in April 2024.

C4T is an academic partnership. Funding details and COI are available on our website.

Previous
Previous

Removing Barriers to Accessing Medical Cannabis for Paediatric Patients

Next
Next

Medical Cannabis for Children: Evidence and Recommendations